Home Contact Us
 
 
 
 
   

MKU Composite Helmets, Steel vs Composite Helmets, steel helmets, composite helmets, comparisons between Steel and Composite Helmets, Steel Helmets vs. Composite Helmets

V50Value
Steel vs. Composite Helmets
Fragmentation Test
Shock Absorption (EN-397)
Helmets Highlights
Helmets Quality Control
Bullet Test
Buoyancy Testing

  MKU :: Steel vs Composite Helmets Helmets  
     
     
 
Steel Helmets vs. Composite Helmets:
 
     
  During World war I and World war II, head protection was provided by thin steel helmets. Steel was universally used. The technology was simple and cost was low. Although steel Helmets could provide good Impact protection in a variety of situations, then could only provide below marginal or low protection against fragments for their weight. The composite helmets on the other hand offer a lower weight and nearly a 100% improvement in ballistic performance. Composite fibers are upto 6 times as strong as steel on an equal weight basis.

Other comparisons between Steel and Composite Helmets can be noted as below:
 
     
 
STEEL HELMETS COMPOSITE HELMETS
   
• 6 times less strong than composite
helmets
• 6 times stronger than steel helmets
• Low Price
• High Price
• Low performance/Weight ratio • High performance/Weight Ratio
• Risk of secondary fragments • No risk of secondary fragments
• Detection by radar • No detection by radar
• Cold in winter/Hot in summer • Better insulation
 
     
     
PASGT
  Advanced Combat
  Aralyte
  Tank Crew
  Paratrooper
  Boltfree
  Mine Clearance
  M-1
  Visors
  Accessories
     
  Designed & Developed by Sirez Infosystems
Copyright 2006 © MKU Pvt. Ltd.